Issue of · 60 decisions on the register

SportspolitikaThe register of decisions in world sport

On the register today: Operation Gold: what a United States medal… · Olympic Solidarity 2025–2028: where the 650… · Medal prize money and the million-dollar line…

01 · 672

Sportspolitika › Governance › entry

Governance

India wrote sports governance into statute. Where the interference line now runs

Filed IndiaReviewed

Empty benches and the speaker’s chair in a parliamentary chamber
Benches and the chair in the chamber of the Dáil, the Irish parliament, photographed from the gallery. Photo: David Kernan / Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 4.0
02 · 1040
Filed
Actor
Parliament of India
Jurisdiction
India
What changed
A statutory board recognises federations and a statutory tribunal decides their disputes with the powers of a civil court
Section
Governance
03 · 672

Most countries regulate sport through funding conditions and company law. India has written the governance of its federations into statute. The National Sports Governance Act 2025 was passed in August 2025 and received assent on 18 August 2025, and it creates two bodies that did not exist before.

The National Sports Board

The Board recognises national sports federations. Recognition is the switch that controls everything downstream — funding, the right to select national teams, the authority to sanction events — and placing it in a statutory body places it outside the federations' own politics.

The National Sports Tribunal

Disputes involving federations, selections and elections go to a statutory tribunal with the powers of a civil court. Indian sport has spent years in writ petitions before the High Courts; the tribunal is an attempt to concentrate that litigation in one specialist forum.

What the Act requires inside a federation

These are composition rules written by a legislature into the internal constitution of private associations — the same technique used in the United States when athlete representation was raised to one third, described in the entry on the 2020 Act.

Where this meets the Olympic Charter

Rule 27 requires National Olympic Committees to preserve their autonomy and resist political pressure, and Rule 28.9 lets the IOC Executive Board suspend a committee where a law or a governmental act has the effect of hampering its activity or the expression of its will. A statute that creates a government-appointed board with power over recognition is exactly the kind of instrument that rule contemplates. Whether it crosses the line is a question of how the powers are exercised, not of how they are drafted, and the consequence if it does is described in A suspended NOC is not a banned team.

The comparison that makes it legible

The football system answers the same question with no discretion at all: a member association must manage its affairs independently, and sanctions may follow even where the interference was not its fault — see the entry on FIFA's articles 14–16. A national statute and that obligation can be in direct conflict, and the federation is the party caught between them.

Where this is written: the National Sports Governance Act 2025; legislative history and text at prsindia.org. The Charter provisions are Rules 27 and 28 of the Olympic Charter.

04 · 1040

Governance on the register, month by month

Entries filed under Governance, against everything filed the same month.

MonthIn GovernanceOn the registerShare
723
02
13
213
412
04
13

Where Governance decisions are taken

Jurisdictions named on the register, Governance first.

JurisdictionIn GovernanceEntriesShare
United States521
Russia519
International416
Chechnya14
India11
Egypt02
Iran02
Albania01
Azerbaijan01
Brazil01

Who acts in Governance

Offices, bodies and people named on the register, Governance first.

ActorEntriesSectionAn entry
United States Congress4GovernanceWhat Congress can do to the USOPC since the 2020 Act
Ramzan Kadyrov3GovernanceMMA hobbyist Ramzan Kadyrov wears medieval armour…
UFC3GovernanceUFC President Dana White: President-elect Donald…
Dana White2GovernanceUFC President Dana White explains support for…
Fedor Emelianenko2GovernanceFedor Emelianenko absent from Ministry of Sports…
Russian Ministry of Sport2GovernanceFedor Emelianenko absent from Ministry of Sports…
State Duma2GovernanceLegendary freestyle wrestler wins seat in Russia’s…
World Anti-Doping Agency2GovernanceWhat changes in the World Anti-Doping Code for 2027
LDPR1GovernanceRussian nationalist party removes press access to…

Sums named in Governance entries and nearby

7 of 60 entries name a figure. Scope: the whole register, Governance first.

FigureActorEntry
USD 20,000,000 a year to the Center for SafeSportUnited States CongressWhat Congress can do to the USOPC since the 2020 Act
USD 250,000 for an individual, USD 1,000,000 for a non-individualUnited States CongressThe Rodchenkov Act: whom it reaches, and what it…
A BMW and over 1 million rubles (approx. $15,600) per medallistYulia Efimova · Russian stateOlympic medalist Yulia Efimova sells BMW gifted by…
Nearly 2 million rubles in bank loansMikhail Mamiashvili · Russian Wrestling FederationGangster who heads Russian Wrestling Federation…
USD 37,500 gold, USD 22,500 silver, USD 15,000 bronzeUnited States Olympic and Paralympic CommitteeOperation Gold: what a United States medal actually…
USD 650,000,000 for the 2025–2028 planOlympic Solidarity CommissionOlympic Solidarity 2025–2028: where the 650 million…
USD 1,000,000 threshold; USD 500,000 for married filing separatelyUnited States CongressMedal prize money and the million-dollar line in…

Nearby on the Governance register

Governance — other entries
FiledActorDecisionWhat changed
World Anti-Doping AgencyWhat changes in the World Anti-Doping Code for 2027A new Code approved on 5 December 2025 replaces the 2021 text from 1 January 2027
United States CongressWhat Congress can do to the USOPC since the 2020 ActCongress took the power to dissolve the USOPC board and decertify a national governing body, and raised athlete representation to one third
Signatories to the World Anti-Doping CodeSignatory or Delegated Third Party: who actually answersOnly a Signatory is bound by the Code and can be found non-compliant; a contractor acting for one answers to the Signatory
United States CongressThe Rodchenkov Act: whom it reaches, and what it costsDoping conspiracy at major international competitions made a federal crime carrying up to ten years, fines and forfeiture
World Anti-Doping Agency Compliance Review CommitteeNon-compliance is not a sanction: how the compliance standard worksA Signatory is first put on a watchlist with a correction period; only after that does a formal non-compliance proposal follow, appealable to CAS
World Anti-Doping AgencyArticle 10.13.2: when a provisional suspension counts towards the banTime served under a provisional suspension is credited only if the suspension was respected, and only from its effective date
Linda McMahon · WWEFormer WWE CEO Linda McMahon considered for Trump’s CabinetA promotion executive is considered for a cabinet post
Russian Ministry of Sport · Fedor EmelianenkoFedor Emelianenko absent from Ministry of Sports hearing on child MMAThe complainant does not attend the ministry hearing he prompted
Earlier entryArticle 10.13.2: when a provisional suspension counts towards the ban
Later entryNon-compliance is not a sanction: how the compliance standard works

Sportspolitika desk

Section: Governance. Sportspolitika keeps the register of decisions: who decided, under which jurisdiction, and what changed. Entries carry the date they were filed under and a link to the text they rest on.

Written and edited at the desk. Reached at [email protected]. Last reviewed .

Sportspolitika

The register of decisions in world sport. The register of decisions in sport and the offices that take them.

Desk: [email protected]

Sections

The desk

Sportspolitika · sportspolitika.com

Entries rest on the texts they link to. Figures, dates and quotations are carried from those texts. Reviewed .